Early Journal Content on JSTOR, Free to Anyone in the World
This article is one of nearly 500,000 scholarly works digitized and made freely available to everyone in
the world byJSTOR.
Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other
writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the
mid-seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries.
We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this
resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non-commercial
Read more about Early Journal Content at http://about.istor.org/participate-istor/individuals/early-
JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people
discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching
platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit
organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please
326 THE JOURNAL OF RELIGION
minds of many Jews, and as one after another sought to enrich the dis-
cussions by his own contribution the book grew to its present dimensions
and character. Finally, it was completely transformed, or at least
sufficiently so that its original skepticism escaped the eye of the common
reader and awaited the discovery of the modern scholar.
The translation is very free. Emendation of the text is generously
indulged in, most of the corrections being taken from Ehrlich's Rand-
glossen; when the text is not changed paraphrase frequently replaces
translation. The objection to this is that it substitutes the author's
own private interpretation for the original text. We really have
before us still another addition to, or revision of, the Book of Job.
This may be seen from the treatment of the famous passage xg:2$i.
which is rendered thus:
Then I would know that my defender will arise,
Even though he arise in the distant future.
Only under my skin is this indited,
And within my flesh do I see these [words].
The "would know" calls for an imperfect instead of the perfect of the
text. "Defender" is rather weak for the text's "avenger" or "redeemer."
"Will arise" is a very free rendering of "is alive" or "lives." "Even
though he arise m the distant future" is very far removed indeed from
the text's "and a later one will rise upon dust." The "only under"
of the next line is clearly an emendation of "and after" (or perhaps,
"and behind"). The "my" in both instances is in the text and need not
be itaUcized. "Indited" is free conjecture for the present text which is
untranslatable. "Within" is a very free rendering of "from"; and
"God" has been ruthlessly eliminated to make way for "these [words]."
Dr. Jastrow is probably right in refusing to credit the original Job with
any hope of a future life, but his conclusion is not strengthened by such
methods as these.
There are many useful and illuminating suggestions in this com-
mentary which will make it of value to scholars, but it is too subjective
and speculative to be a safe guide for the unwary layman.
J. M. Powis Smith
University of Chicago
IMPORTANT STUDIES IN ANCIENT PALESTINIAN
This is the first of a series which ought to continue and grow more
and more valuable with succeeding years. This volume contains four
' The Annual of the American School of Oriental Research in Jerusalem. Vol. I
(for 1919-20). By C. C. Torrey. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1920. xiii+92
BOOK REVIEWS 327
studies by as many of the annual directors of the School in Jerusalem.
Dr. Torrey, the first director, contributes a description and discussion
of "A Phoenician Necropolis at Sidon" illustrated by four plates and
other views of the anthropoid sarcophagi unearthed in the center of an
open field by the director and his assistants in 1901. The fine photo-
graphs and descriptions make us indorse heartily Professor Torrey's
hope that these splendid specimens of the art of Phoenicia, which are
still in the hands of the natives, may be made accessible to students of
art as soon as possible. Professor H. G. Mitchell, who died last May,
after his article had gone to press, furnishes a description of "The
Modern Wall of Jerusalem," splendidly and lavishly illustrated by
seventy-one plates. Professor L. B. Paton discusses and illustrates
some "Survivals of Primitive Religion in Modern Palestine," using
materials gathered while in the company of the late Professor Samuel
Ives Curtiss, in the summer of 1903. The volume closes with "Glean-
ings in Archaeology and Epigraphy" by Professor Warren J. Moulton,
of Bangor. The "Gleanings" have to do with "cup-marks," recently
discovered pyxes supposed to have been discovered at Beit Jibrin about
1912, some Palestinian figurines, and a Greek inscription from the village
of Caesarea in Palestine.
The study of the walls of Jerusalem concerns itself chiefly with the
tj^es of masonry represented in them. The fulness of the description
and the numerous excellent photographs combine to make the structure
of the walls as vivid to the mind as it can possibly be made to one who has
not seen the walls themselves. The most interesting section of this re-
port to the student of religion is, of course, the section on " Survivals of
Primitive Religion." This contains a full list of all the holy places of
ancient Canaan named in the Old Testament, classified according as
they were springs, trees, mountains, caves, graves, or holy stones. Each
of these types of shrine is then discussed from the point of view of the
practice of the modern inhabitants in treating it as a sacred place.
Mohammedans, Druses, and Christians all alike have taken over more
or less these ancient sanctuaries and have continued down to the present
day the religious veneration accorded them in former times by Canaan-
ite worshipers. In each case the rites are brought into some sort of
external conformity to the worshiper's professed religion, though in
most cases they are in essence markedly at variance with it. Ancient
customs die hard and ancient religious customs are almost immortal.
J. M. Powis Smith
University of Chicago