Skip to main content

Full text of "A New Dictionary of Religion and Ethics"

See other formats


STOP 



Early Journal Content on JSTOR, Free to Anyone in the World 

This article is one of nearly 500,000 scholarly works digitized and made freely available to everyone in 
the world by JSTOR. 

Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other 
writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the 
mid-seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. 

We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this 
resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non-commercial 
purposes. 

Read more about Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate-jstor/individuals/early- 
journal-content . 



JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people 
discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching 
platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit 
organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please 
contact support@jstor.org. 



BOOK REVIEWS 



A NEW DICTIONARY OF RELIGION AND ETHICS 

A new reference book for students of religion has recently appeared. 1 
It was prepared for the average pastor and thoughtful layman and not 
for the specialist in any field. A large number of the articles are brief 
definitions or explanations of significant terms in theology, church 
history, and comparative religions. It is at the same time, however, 
an encyclopedia, covering a wide and interesting field in a series of valu- 
able articles. Here, for example, is the field of comparative religions, 
of primitive religions and the various faiths and cults, past and present. 
Articles like that on "Bahaism" by Sprengling, "Mystery Religions" 
by Case, "Faith Healing" by Kantor, and "Millenarianism" by Cross, 
suggest the attention to recent problems that are of wider interest. 
Only a thorough mastery of the materials enables a writer to bring so 
much into so brief compass and to set forth what is given in such clear 
and readable fashion as here. 

In the philosophy and psychology of religion typical articles are 
those by Lyman on "Philosophy of Religion," by Pratt on "Psychology 
of Religion," "by Mathews on "Religion," and Watson on "Religious 
Experience." Here as elsewhere the promise of articles written 
"objectively, without speculation or propaganda," is carried out. 
Articles on Democracy, Liberty, Social Gospel, Social Service of the 
Church, Labor Movement, Family, Divorce, and Amusements suggest 
the interest in ethics and especially social ethics. Specific treatment 
from the Christian standpoint of such pressing ethical problems as those 
of property, the nature and authority of the state, and the principles 
governing international relations might be added here to advantage. 

With the growing attention to matters of doctrine, no part of this 
dictionary will be of more interest than the articles dealing with these 
subjects. Those by Gerald Birney Smith, the chief contributor in this 
department, deserve special mention. In orderly arrangement and 
clear statement they are admirably adapted to the general reader. 
Their compact form makes possible the inclusion of all important 
materials. Their tone is objective and the statement of the various 

1 A Dictionary of Religion and Ethics. Edited by Shailer Mathews and Gerald 
Birney Smith. New York: Macmillan Co., 1921. vii+513 pages. $8.00. 



BOOK REVIEWS 211 

positions is eminently fair. The articles on God, Christology, Super- 
natural, Miracles, and Salvation are instances in point. The contribu- 
tions of Mathews, Beckwith, Cross, and others are of the same kind 
(note especially Mathews' comprehensive article on Christianity). The 
dictionary offers valuable help to the man who wishes to know what 
sound modern scholarship is saying and to have at the same time a 
fair statement of the traditional views. 

Would not the average reader appreciate a fuller statement of these 
matters and readily spare a large number of the smaller articles to which 
a few lines of formal definition or description are devoted ? Take, for 
example, Asura, Asvins, Atar, Atargatis, Atavism, Atharvaveda, Atman, 
Autocephali, Avarice, Avignon, Athos, Atrophy, Austerities. Some of 
these are of interest only to the specialist, and the meaning of others 
could be taken from easily available books of reference. 

A hasty survey reveals a few of those errors which elude even the care- 
ful. The Methodist Episcopal, not the Episcopal church, established 
its missions in Japan in 1873. "Apocrypha" appears as "Apochrypha" 
not once but throughout the article on that subject. 

A final question concerns the article on Christian Science which has 
been furnished by the Christian Science Board of Directors. Presum- 
ably the editors followed here the principle suggested in their prospectus, 
to have articles written "as far as possible by those most in sympathy 
with their subject." In so doing, however, have they not violated their 
other and primary principle, to have articles that are "written histori- 
cally, objectively, without speculation or propaganda" ? Do the princi- 
ples of Christian Science permit a scientific and historical discussion by 
its adherents? The special student will be interested in reading this 
article, but will it give the average reader the reliable account which 
he has the right to expect in such a work, and the answer to important 
questions? For example, what is the position of Christian Science as 
to the personality of God? Does unreal mean what is not or what 
ought not to be ? What about the origin of the movement, and Mrs. 
Eddy's relation to Quimby and other influences? We are not helped 
here by the repetition of orthodox historical misstatements or of Mrs. 
Eddy's ambiguous phrases. It is to be regretted that the editors in 
regard to this article followed the precedent of the Encyclopedia of 
Religion and Ethics. It should be added that the bibliography in the 
Appendix gives some corrective by reference to other works, as Hastings 
does not. 

This bibliography deserves a special word of appreciation. Here are 
given, under the heads of the principal subjects discussed, brief lists of 



212 THE JOURNAL OF RELIGION 

the most important references. No question is more often raised than 
that of the best books on a given subject. These lists have been care- 
fully prepared. They are not so long as to confuse, and they should 
be of great aid to the student. 

In the fields of theology, ethics, comparative religions, psychology 
and philosophy of religion, missions and church history, this dictionary 
gives authoritative information in compact and yet readable form. It 
will be of interest to the special student, and of large value to the pastor 
and the increasing number of laymen who are inquiring as to these 
subjects. 

Harris Franklin Rall 

Garrett Biblical Institute 



A NOTABLE ROMAN CATHOLIC VERSION OF THE 
NEW TESTAMENT 1 

Everyone must heartily welcome a new English version of the Bible 
under Roman Catholic auspices. Surely no one can use the antiquated 
and defective Douay version, even in such revisions as Challoner's or 
Kenrick's, with satisfaction. The Protestant world may join with all 
Catholics in the gratification which this admirable work must bring. 
We may expect to see the other three New Testament volumes shortly, 
and the Old Testament will follow as soon as may be. The names of 
the general editors are a guaranty of adequate scholarship, and it is 
good to be assured that the enterprise has " the approval of the English 
hierarchy and the co-operation of many distinguished Scripture Scholars 
in England, Ireland and America." Without this, indeed, the work could 
not have seen the light, but the plain statement of it is pleasant. 

The present volume sets a high standard for its successors. The 
contributors include, besides the general editors, Fr. Rickaby, Fr. 
Keogh, and Archbishop Goodier, all English Jesuits. The work is first 
and foremost a translation. There are brief introductions to the several 
epistles, and four brief appendixes on special points, in addition to foot- 
notes on each page. But these serve primarily to clarify or justify the 
translation. They reveal competent scholarship of the modern type, 
scholarship positive, constructive, reverent. It is, of course, scholar- 
ship within bounds. Thus we read that the primitive church in 
Thessalonica "was one in faith and government, bound to the other 

1 The Westminster Version of the Sacred Scriptures. General Editors: The Rev. 
Cuthbert Lattey, S.J., and the Rev. Joseph Keating, S.J. The New Testament, 
Vol. Ill: St. Paxil's Epistles to the Churches. London and New York: Longmans, 
Green & Co., 1921. briii+ 258 pages. $2.50.